This week I was honored to speak at the Machine Learning Security Seminar organized by the Pattern Recognition and Applications Lab at University of Cagliari. I presented my work on relating adversarial robustness to flatness in the robust loss landscape, also touching on the relationship to weight robustness. In this article, I want to share the recording and slides of this talk.
Last week, I had the pleasure to give a talk at the recently started Seminar on Distribution-Free Statistics organized by Anastasios Angelopoulos. Specifically, I talked about conformal training, a procedure allowing to train a classifier and conformal predictor end-to-end. This allows to optimize arbitrary losses defined directly on the confidence sets obtained through conformal prediction and can be shown to improve inefficiency and other metrics for any conformal predictor used at test time. In this article, I want to share the corresponding recording.
In October, I had the pleasure to present my recent work on adversarial robustness and flat minima at the math machine learning seminar of MPI MiS and UCLA organized by Guido Montúfar. The talk covers several aspects of my PhD research on adversarial robustness and robustness in terms of the model weights. This article shares abstract and recording of the talk.
Conformal prediction (CP) allows to take any classifier and turn it into a set predictor with a guarantee that the true class is included with use-specified probability. This allows to develop classifiers with sufficient guarantees for safe deployment in many domains. However, CP is usually used as a post-training calibration step. Our paper presented in this article presents a training procedure name conformal training allowing to train classifier and conformal predictor end-to-end. This can reduce the average confidence set size and allows to optimize arbitrary objectives defined directly on the predicted sets.
In October this year, my work on relating adversarially robust generalization to flat minima in the (robust) loss surface with respect to weight perturbations was presented at ICCV’21. As oral presentation at ICCV’21, I recorded a 12 minute talk highlighting the main insights how (robust) flatness can avoid robust overfitting of adversarial training and improve robustness against adversarial examples. In this article, I want to share the recording.
As part of the Qualcomm Innovation Fellowship 2019, I have a talk on the research produced throughout the academic year 2019/2020. This talk covers two exciting works on robustness: robustness against various types of adversarial examples using confidence-calibrated adversarial training (CCAT) and robustness against bit errors in the model’s quantized weights. The latter can be shown to be important to reduce the energy-consumption of accelerators for neural networks. In this article, I want to share the slides corresponding to the talk.
In June this year, my work on bit error robustness of deep neural networks (DNNs) was recognized as outstanding paper at the CVPR’21 Workshop on Adversarial Machine Learning in Real-World Computer Vision Systems and Online Challenges (AML-CV). Thus, as part of the workshop, I prepared a 15 minute talk highlighting how robustness against bit errors in DNN weights can improve the energy-efficiency of DNN accelerators. In this article, I want to share the recording.
Deep neural network (DNN) accelerators are popular due to reduced cost and energy compared to GPUs. To further reduce energy consumption, the operating voltage of the on-chip memory can be reduced. However, this injects random bit errors, directly impacting the (quantized) DNN weights. As result, improving DNN robustness against these bit errors can significantly improve energy efficiency. Similarly, these chips are subject to bit-level hardware- or software-based attacks. In this case, robustness against adversarial bit errors is required to improve security of DNN accelerators. Our paper presented in this article addresses both problems.
Recent work on robustness againt adversarial examples identified a severe problem in adversarial training: (robust) overfitting. That is, during training the training robustness continuously increases, while test robustness starts decreasing eventually. In this pre-print, we relate robust overfitting and good robust generalization to flatness around the found minimum in the robust loss landscape with respect to perturbations in the weights.