DAVIDSTUTZ

23thJULY2019

READING

Sascha Saralajew, Lars Holdijk, Maike Rees, Thomas Villmann. Robustness of Generalized Learning Vector Quantization Models against Adversarial Attacks. CoRR abs/1902.00577 (2019).

Saralajew et al. evaluate learning vector quantization (LVQ) approaches regarding their robustness against adversarial examples. In particular, they consider generalized LVQ where examples are classified based on their distance to the closest prototype of the same class and the closest prototype of another class. The prototypes are learned during training; I refer to the paper for details. Robustness is compared to adversarial training and evaluated against several attacks, including FGSM, DeepFool and Boundary – both white-box and black-box attacks. Regarding $L_\infty$, LVQ usually demonstrates poorer performance than adversarial training. Still, robustness seems to be higher than normally trained deep neural networks. One of the main explanations of the authors is that LVQ follows a max-margin approach; this max-margin idea seems to favor robust models.

Also find this summary on ShortScience.org.

What is your opinion on the summarized work? Or do you know related work that is of interest? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below: